<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Metafoodblogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:51:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dylwah</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>dylwah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/?p=1298#comment-1414</guid>
		<description>The thing that keeps coming to the front of my mind is the practice of engagement, emerging from the realisation that if I sit and read words about food too long - online or onpaper - I become restless and unhappy. 

it seems to me that one of the great cons of this urbanisation experiment that we are  conducting is that we can be unengaged with our food supply.  As we keep seeing contamination and blandness keep biting us on the bum.  what stikes me as a little weird is that while so many of us have become unengaged with food production actors such as fast food providers, cook book publishers and food critics sell us a simulcrum of that engagement which fails to fill the vacum left left us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that keeps coming to the front of my mind is the practice of engagement, emerging from the realisation that if I sit and read words about food too long &#8211; online or onpaper &#8211; I become restless and unhappy. </p>
<p>it seems to me that one of the great cons of this urbanisation experiment that we are  conducting is that we can be unengaged with our food supply.  As we keep seeing contamination and blandness keep biting us on the bum.  what stikes me as a little weird is that while so many of us have become unengaged with food production actors such as fast food providers, cook book publishers and food critics sell us a simulcrum of that engagement which fails to fill the vacum left left us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/?p=1298#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>Also, I have edited errors in this post three times since I posted it.  Not pretending to hold to a standard there ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I have edited errors in this post three times since I posted it.  Not pretending to hold to a standard there ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/?p=1298#comment-1404</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been thinking about this a lot, and hesitating about commenting. The thing that keeps coming to the front of my mind is the practice of engagement, emerging from the realisation that if I sit and read words about food too long - online or onpaper - I become restless and unhappy.  

I don&#039;t know whether it&#039;s because I&#039;ve been blogging in one way or another for almost five years, but I feel dissatisfied to be just a consumer of information about food.  When I mainly blogged about non-food things, I wrote a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://crazybrave.net/2005/02/01/i-am-blogger-hear-me-roar/&quot; rel=&quot;external&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;why I blog&lt;/a&gt;&quot; post (nearly four years ago!!!!) where the same dissatisfaction came up, which makes me think it&#039;s a generational or constitutional issue rather than one specific to food writing.  In the same way that I appreciate being able to ask questions and be taken seriously by the producers that I patronise, I don&#039;t want information about food to be just a one-way street.  I can see how that demand for engagement must be a headfuck for someone who is engaged to write about food with expectations that their expertise will set them apart from their readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about this a lot, and hesitating about commenting. The thing that keeps coming to the front of my mind is the practice of engagement, emerging from the realisation that if I sit and read words about food too long &#8211; online or onpaper &#8211; I become restless and unhappy.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know whether it&#8217;s because I&#8217;ve been blogging in one way or another for almost five years, but I feel dissatisfied to be just a consumer of information about food.  When I mainly blogged about non-food things, I wrote a &#8220;<a href="http://crazybrave.net/2005/02/01/i-am-blogger-hear-me-roar/" rel="external" rel="nofollow">why I blog</a>&#8221; post (nearly four years ago!!!!) where the same dissatisfaction came up, which makes me think it&#8217;s a generational or constitutional issue rather than one specific to food writing.  In the same way that I appreciate being able to ask questions and be taken seriously by the producers that I patronise, I don&#8217;t want information about food to be just a one-way street.  I can see how that demand for engagement must be a headfuck for someone who is engaged to write about food with expectations that their expertise will set them apart from their readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Sister Outlaw</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Sister Outlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/?p=1298#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>Excellent post - the thing that makes me smirk is when perfectly well-remunerated mainstream media journos are obliged to go and write a blog for their newspaper, just to keep with the Joneses.

I think there is so much to be said for the food blog ... much better than the faux promos you get in so much food journalism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post &#8211; the thing that makes me smirk is when perfectly well-remunerated mainstream media journos are obliged to go and write a blog for their newspaper, just to keep with the Joneses.</p>
<p>I think there is so much to be said for the food blog &#8230; much better than the faux promos you get in so much food journalism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamahl</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/?p=1298#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>We can&#039;t we all just get along?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can&#8217;t we all just get along?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St33v (aka 24601)</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>St33v (aka 24601)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/?p=1298#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>Rating the comments, I&#039;d say te score is:

Bloggers: 10
Journos:    0 

Even with a home ground advantage, I&#039;d say they might need to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,24755206-7582,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sack &lt;/a&gt;their &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kirk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;coach&lt;/a&gt;.

[update: looks like the new Fairfax boss is keen to follow Kirk&#039;s example of sacking journos.  Maybe they will become bloggers? {fires up Les Mis soundtrack}]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rating the comments, I&#8217;d say te score is:</p>
<p>Bloggers: 10<br />
Journos:    0 </p>
<p>Even with a home ground advantage, I&#8217;d say they might need to <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,24755206-7582,00.html" rel="nofollow">sack </a>their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kirk" rel="nofollow">coach</a>.</p>
<p>[update: looks like the new Fairfax boss is keen to follow Kirk's example of sacking journos.  Maybe they will become bloggers? {fires up Les Mis soundtrack}]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dylwah</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1388</link>
		<dc:creator>dylwah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/?p=1298#comment-1388</guid>
		<description>Yeah this MSM snarkiness comes close to getting my goat smetimes, but then i smother it in olive oil, lemon juice, oregano, garlic, salt, pepper and just a smidge of chilli, chuck it on the spit till it is just right and serve with unlevaned bread garlic yoghurt and salad, so if they want any they have to wait in line.

It seems that they have forgotten that the msm is just the pale and insipid rump, prob finished on grain, of what was a vibrant and diverse set of media organs.  Bunch of wosses prob don&#039;t like offal.  Back when i had to fight off the remenants of Australia&#039;s megafauna and Joh B. P. for my bit of meat and three veg there were at least six, english language, daily papers in sydney.  a generation before, at least twice that.

I may not be a food blogger, but i have had a meal with a journo at a restaurant and they thought that they were Gandalf&#039;s Gift to Humanity.  I got to admit that i was ready to play along &#039;cause i was a student and they were paying.  but really they are like the cheepest chicken in the supermarket cooler, not the best just the most expedient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah this MSM snarkiness comes close to getting my goat smetimes, but then i smother it in olive oil, lemon juice, oregano, garlic, salt, pepper and just a smidge of chilli, chuck it on the spit till it is just right and serve with unlevaned bread garlic yoghurt and salad, so if they want any they have to wait in line.</p>
<p>It seems that they have forgotten that the msm is just the pale and insipid rump, prob finished on grain, of what was a vibrant and diverse set of media organs.  Bunch of wosses prob don&#8217;t like offal.  Back when i had to fight off the remenants of Australia&#8217;s megafauna and Joh B. P. for my bit of meat and three veg there were at least six, english language, daily papers in sydney.  a generation before, at least twice that.</p>
<p>I may not be a food blogger, but i have had a meal with a journo at a restaurant and they thought that they were Gandalf&#8217;s Gift to Humanity.  I got to admit that i was ready to play along &#8217;cause i was a student and they were paying.  but really they are like the cheepest chicken in the supermarket cooler, not the best just the most expedient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/2008/12/09/metafoodblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-1387</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 01:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.progressivedinnerparty.net/?p=1298#comment-1387</guid>
		<description>well that&#039;s the question, isn&#039;t it? How to claim your own point of differentiation, and then keep demonstrating it, keep on song. In your own style. Repeating your strengths. How easy is it to be drawn away from the path that brought you your readers in the first place? And, apropos Sammy&#039;s, Willa and I will abjure their style (and after-effects) in favour of Wagarama, two doors down, whose food has been great each time we&#039;ve been there recently. And the staff are appropriately perky, and you don&#039;t feel as if you&#039;ve submitted yourself to a food-stuffing, eat-it-fast cultural experience... Maybe you should invite guest reviewers to your blog? First you need to check my legal professor who told me the other day that you can&#039;t defame a company any more, only an individual. If this is true, food bloggers need to know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well that&#8217;s the question, isn&#8217;t it? How to claim your own point of differentiation, and then keep demonstrating it, keep on song. In your own style. Repeating your strengths. How easy is it to be drawn away from the path that brought you your readers in the first place? And, apropos Sammy&#8217;s, Willa and I will abjure their style (and after-effects) in favour of Wagarama, two doors down, whose food has been great each time we&#8217;ve been there recently. And the staff are appropriately perky, and you don&#8217;t feel as if you&#8217;ve submitted yourself to a food-stuffing, eat-it-fast cultural experience&#8230; Maybe you should invite guest reviewers to your blog? First you need to check my legal professor who told me the other day that you can&#8217;t defame a company any more, only an individual. If this is true, food bloggers need to know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.300 seconds -->
